⌘+K

Pulse Explore Clubs Researchers Journals

Home Clubs Explore

August 1, 2024Cancer MedicineOpen Access

Comparison of the TNM9th and 8th editions for localized and locally advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma treated nonsurgically and proposal of a new stage grouping system

Ai-Hong Zheng Yiwen Wang Shuang Li Yingjie Wang Hong’en Xu Jieni Ding Bingchen Chen Tao Song Lei Lai

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

To compare the survival discrimination of the TNM9th and 8th editions for localized and locally advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC) treated nonsurgically and suggest a simple revised staging system with data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Zheng et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5dd94b6db643587573451 https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.70119

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1A Population‐Level Validation of the New 9th Edition of the American Joint Commission on Cancer Staging System for Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma2024
2Validation of the 9th edition of the TNM staging system for non-small cell lung cancer with lobectomy in stage IA–IIIA2024 · 12 citations
3Validation of IASLC 9th Edition TNM Classification for Lung Cancer: Focus on N Descriptor2024
4Comparison of the eighth and ninth editions of American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control staging for non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Original Research · 2026
5Despite improved overall stratification, the 9th edition stage IIIA category remains prognostically heterogeneous: insights from a T3N2a subgroup analysisCohort Study · 2026