Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract With some recent exceptions, demands for global reparations have largely been ignored by former colonial countries. While the past two decades has seen renewed interest in colonial reparations in normative political theory and philosophy, this work has focused on determining responsibility for redress. By contrast, relatively little has been said on the further question of how redress might be sought in face of persistent colonial amnesia and apologia. This paper defends expropriation—unilateral public takeovers of ownership and/or control of foreign assets—as a justified response to overdue colonial reparations. In making this case, the paper (1) moves our focus beyond questions of responsibility for reparative justice to consider what victims of past injustice (and/or their descendants) are justified in doing to obtain their due and (2) explores distinctive issues that arise for political resistance at the global level.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Shuk Ying Chan (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5dd9eb6db643587573893 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12891
Shuk Ying Chan
American Journal of Political Science
University College London
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: