Purpose: To investigate the influencing factors of self-management of diabetic retinopathy (DR) by constructing a structural equation model (SEM) to analyze the relationships among self-management behavior, perceived social support, and trait coping style as well as to determine the influencing path in order to provide a theoretical reference for exploring a multipath health management model that can be used to improve the quality of life of DR patients. Patients and Methods: A total of 388 patients with DR were enrolled in this cross-sectional study conducted from January 2020 to January 2023. All subjects completed a general questionnaire and were assessed by the Self-management Scale for Patients with Diabetic Retinopathy, the Perceived Social Support Scale, and the Trait Coping Style Scale. Structural equation modeling was employed to examine the relationship between self-management and its influencing factors. The bootstrap method was used to examine the path relationships among self-management, perceived social support, and trait coping styles in DR patients. Results: A total of 346 valid questionnaires were collected in this study, with a response rate of 89% (346/388). The average score of self-management of DR patients was 69.50± 18.32, and it was significantly positively correlated with perceived social support and positive coping (r=0.624, r=0.578, both P < 0.01). The total effect of perceived social support on DR self-management was 1.439, with a direct effect of 1.056 and an indirect effect of 0.384. Positive coping played a mediating role in perceived social support and self-management. Conclusion: The self-management of DR was at an intermediate level. Perceived social support and trait coping styles were important influencing factors for self-management behavior in DR patients. Therefore, improving perceived social support and trait coping styles can promote the self-management behavior of DR patients, reduce their psychological burden, and improve their compliance and quality of life.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sa et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: