Cross-sectional analysis reveals that self-efficacy and support significantly influence diabetes self-management in patients.
Background: Diabetes mellitus is a major global health challenge requiring lifelong self-management. Optimal diabetes self-management is influenced not only by clinical factors but also by psychosocial and interpersonal aspects, including self-efficacy, psychological stress, family support, and healthcare communication. Objective: This study aimed to analyses the influence of psychosocial and interpersonal factors on diabetes self-management among patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM). Methods: A cross-sectional analytical study was conducted among 50 T2DM patients at RSUD Jombang from January to March 2025. Data were collected using validated instruments, including the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities (SDSCA), Diabetes Management Self-Efficacy Scale (DMSES), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), and a healthcare communication questionnaire. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, correlation tests, and multiple linear regression. Results: Self-efficacy showed a significant positive correlation with diabetes self-management (r = 0.521; p = 0.001), while psychological stress showed a significant negative correlation (r = -0.463; p = 0.002). Family support (r = 0.487; p = 0.001) and healthcare communication (r = 0.455; p = 0.003) were positively associated with self-management. Multiple regression analysis revealed that all variables significantly influenced diabetes self-management, with self-efficacy as the strongest predictor (β = 0.41; p = 0.002). The model explained 50.7% of the variance. However, this study is limited by its cross-sectional design, small sample size, and reliance on self-reported data, which may affect generalizability and causal interpretation. Conclusion: Psychosocial and interpersonal factors significantly influence diabetes self-management. Interventions should focus on improving self-efficacy, reducing stress, enhancing family support, and strengthening healthcare communication to improve patient outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zatihulwani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: