Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: New and innovative materials are being marketed for the treatment of coronal pulpotomy. It is crucial to compare their efficacy with already-established materials. TheraCal PT (TP) is such a new material that studies are scarce. Aim: This study aim to compare and evaluate the outcome of coronal pulpotomy using Biodentine and a newly introduced calcium silicate-based dual-cure resin cement, TP, in patients with symptoms of irreversible pulpitis. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients with exposed carious pulp and symptomatic irreversible pulpitis were included, aged 18–40, randomly allocated to two groups: TP (group I) and Biodentine (group II). Coronal pulpotomy was performed following a standardized protocol, with TP or Biodentine applied accordingly. The pain was recorded using Visual Analog Scale preoperatively for up to 1 week. Success was assessed clinically and radiographically for up to 12 months. Statistical Analysis Used: The data were analyzed using the Friedman test and the Mann–Whitney U -test. Intragroup pain was analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Among 60 patients, intervention was done in 53. By removing dropout patients, 47 were analyzed, with 38 available for follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months. The Biodentine group exhibited a 12-month success rate of 84%, while the TP group revealed 77.3%, with statistically insignificant difference ( P = 0.563). Conclusion: TP can be effectively utilized as a pulpotomy material in cases of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mature permanent teeth, offering rapid setting and ease of use, although Biodentine yielded slightly better results in this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baranwal et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: