Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Abstract The condition of the road pavement can be judged from the functional performance by measuring the surface condition of the pavement and the value of surface roughness. Pavement surface condition measurements are usually carried out using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) survey method. While the measurement of surface roughness values is usually carried out with the Roughness survey method so that the International Roughness Index (IRI) is obtained. This study tries to evaluate the value of a pavement condition by reviewing functional performance to identify the value of the pavement condition. Checking road conditions in this study was carried out using two survey methods, namely the International Roughness Index (IRI) method, the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) method. The results of the examination are analyzed so that the correlation between each method can be known. The results of the study explained that based on the results of observations of the functional condition of road pavements with the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) method using the Hawkeye 2000 tool on the Demak Ring Road section, a PCI value of 65.34 was obtained with the “Fair” category, the functional condition of the road pavement with the International Roughness Index (IRI) method of the Hawkeye 2000 tool on the Demak Ring Road section obtained a IRI value of 6.60 with the category “Medium”, and the correlation of the functional condition of road work using the Pavement Condition Index (PCI) method with the International Roughness Index (IRI) on the Demak Ring Road section has no correlation.
Novianti et al. (Thu,) studied this question.