Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, we propose a conceptual framework and prove "The AI Incompleteness Theorem" within that framework. The theorem presented here states that it is not possible to guarantee an AI/ML inferencing system that is hallucination-free, even with an infinite amount of model training data and with an infinite amount of compute resources to train AI/ML models with that data. We prove this theorem using the properties of infinite sets, Cantor's theorem and Hilbert's Grand Hotel paradox. We also provide a new definition of AGI (artificial general intelligence) within this conceptual framework. We define a system having attained AGI as a system that does not produce infinitely many hallucinations when presented with infinitely many input datasets. We present a corollary that states AGI is not possible even with an infinite amount of training data and an infinite amount of compute resources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prasad P. Jogalekar (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: