Abstract The European Union is facing a major challenge: irregular migration. Our aim in this paper is to shed light on a past EU migration policy through the lens of a rigorous analysis of its impact. To this end, we look at the EU-Turkey statement, an agreement reached in March 2016 to contrast irregular migration from Turkey to the EU. Despite the intention to curb migration flows, combat smuggling and improve border security, the implementation of the EU-Turkey deal has raised questions about its effectiveness and humanitarian impact. Drawing on existing literature and empirical data, this study examines the causal impact of the EU-Turkey statement on migration patterns and fatalities in the Mediterranean. Using a matrix completion estimator for panel data, we assess the diversion effect of the agreement by quantifying the number of migrants diverted to alternative routes and estimating the lives lost at sea as a result. Our results show a significant diversion effect from the Eastern Mediterranean to the Central route, which undermines the core objective of the agreement to reduce border crossings. We estimate an increase of 1976 ± 102 migrants on the central route due to the agreement from April to December 2016. We also find a correlation between the diversion effect and the risk of death on the main migration routes, resulting in a net increase of 44 ± 3 lives lost at sea. We highlight the unintended consequences of bilateral migration agreements and emphasize the need for a broader perspective when designing future policies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tafani et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: