Introduction Gastric cancer has an age-standardized annual incidence rate of 8-9 cases per 100,000 population in Sweden, often diagnosed in a late stage requiring complex treatment strategies. The aim was to study and evaluate the effect of multidisciplinary conferences (MDC) on survival in Swedish gastric cancer patients from 2006-2021. Method A retrospective cohort study of 7818 patients identified in the national registry for esophageal- and gastric cancer (NREV) was performed. Survival outcomes were compared using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for clinical and demographic variables identified with a directed acyclic graph. Result In 5282 (68%) patients treatment recommendation was made at an MDC, rising from 20% in 2006 to 90% in 2021. Median follow-up was 9.5 months. 6510 patients were included in multivariate analysis. MDC patients had improved survival (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.95, p=0.001), similarly found in subgroup analysis of patients older than 80 years (HR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.73-0.92, p=0.001), low performance status (ECOG 3-4, HR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.54-0.74, p<0.001) and late-stage disease (stage IV, HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.84-0.98, p=0.012), Figure 1. Discussion MDC-guided treatment decisions is positively associated with increased survival in gastric cancer patients. This effect persists when looking at characteristics traditionally excluding patients from MDC (i.e. age >80, low performance status and advanced disease). The results suggest that more patients might benefit from insights at MDCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Engborg et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: