BACKGROUND Brain biopsy carries a morbidity risk of ~5%, which has significantly limited samples available for research, hindering our understanding and treatment of brain metastases (BrM) and Leptomeningeal Disease (LMD). However, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) – which circulates the CNS, significantly interfacing with brain tumor tissues and carries tumor cell-free nucleic acids and LMD cells – provides a critically understudied biospecimen to understand BrM/LMD biology. We previously found brain tumor-specific cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in CSF, even when not detectable in blood; and showed that the mutant fraction of cfDNA mirrored treatment response and disease progression. Expanding to study CSF cell-free mRNA (cfRNA) allowed us to extend from mutation-driven cancers (e.g., BRAF/melanoma, EGFR/lung cancer) to investigate the transcriptional profiles of not only cancer, but also brain-resident cells. METHODS We have banked, and have ready-access to, 300+ CSF samples from patients with brain tumors and LMD, many of whom were treated at Stanford Hospital (2012 – 2023). We then leveraged a combination of total RNA extraction and whole transcriptome RNA sequencing to interrogate gene expression patterns present in CSF cfRNA. A method we term CSF-Seq. RESULTS CSF-Seq has revealed expression profiles in LMD CSF not found in CSF of non-LMD cancers, like gliomas, and non-cancer controls, like hydrocephalous. Importantly, CSF-Seq accurately recapitulates our previous panel-based qPCR method, demonstrating upregulated cancer-associated genes like CEACAM6 and MUC1 in breast and lung LMD, and ubiquitous expression of brain-associated genes, like MBP, across all CSF samples. This demonstrates our ability to retrieve well-established, validated target genes, while positioning us to discover novel gene signatures in LMD. CONCLUSION These results serve as a starting point for identifying key gene expression signatures associated with development of LMD and BrM progression. Further investigation focused on tumor-brain crosstalk, and gene signatures associated with response to treatment, will provide promising targets for therapeutic advancement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Garcia et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: