Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
According to the standard formulation, natural selection requires variation, differential fitness, and heritability. I argue that this formulation is inadequate because it fails to distinguish natural selection from artificial selection, intelligent design, forward-looking orthogenetic selection, and adaptation via the selection of nonrandom variation. I suggest adding a no teleology condition. The no teleology condition says that the evolutionary process is not guided toward an endpoint represented in the mind of an agent, variation is produced randomly with respect to adaptation, and selection pressures are not forward looking.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nathan Cofnas (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: