Objective To investigate whether there are significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between frozen-thawed D3/D5 and D3/D6 sequential embryo transfer (SeET) in women with repeated implantation failure (RIF). Methods Women who experienced RIF and underwent frozen-thawed cycles with SeET were included and were divided into two groups: D3/D5 (n=455) and D3/D6 (n=308). Included cycles were stratified by the quality of transferred embryos and age. Results There were 252/455 (55.4%) clinical pregnancies in the D3/D5 group and 133/308 (43.2%) in the D3/D6 group (OR: 1.63, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.18). Rates for ectopic pregnancy, early miscarriage and multiple pregnancies did not differ between the two groups. In women under 35 years, with transfers of two good-quality embryos, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the D3/D5 group compared with the D3/D6 group (65.6% vs 42.4%, OR: 2.59, 95% CI 1.41 to 4.76). This trend persisted when analysing good-quality cleavage-stage embryo and poor-quality blastocyst (D3/D5) transfers versus two good-quality embryo (D3/D6) transfers (61.2% vs 42.4%, OR: 2.14, 95% CI 1.11 to 4.12). For women aged 35 years or older, pregnancy outcomes did not differ. Conclusion The clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the D3/D5 group compared with the D3/D6 group. When contrasting the outcomes of transferring a good-quality cleavage-stage embryo and a poor-quality blastocyst in the D3/D5 group with transferring two good-quality embryos in the D3/D6 group, the clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the D3/D5 group. However, among women aged 35 years or older, there were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: