Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
August 1, 2024Koşuyolu Heart JournalOpen Access

A 5-year Evaluation of the Recurrence Rate Following Conventional Surgery and Ablation for Venous Insufficiency Revealed That Although Ablation Methods Were Employed, Conventional Surgery Was Not Abandoned

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

FGFarid GojayevFYFatih YiğitAPAdıl Polat

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Gojayev et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5e2bab6db643587577317https://doi.org/10.51645/khj.2024.448
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1One-year clinical and anatomical outcomes of endovenous radiofrequency ablation for saphenous vein insufficiency: A real-world cohort study2026
  2. 2Comparative Study between Radiofrequency Ablation and Laser Ablation in Treatment of Varicose Vein2024
  3. 3Radiofrequency ablation versus stripping of great saphenous vein in the management of varicose veins2024
  4. 4Efficacy and safety of traditional open surgery versus radiofrequency ablation for great saphenous varicose veins: a retrospective comparative study2026
  5. 5Management of recurrent varicose veins: Redo open surgery versus endovascular approaches2025 · 2 citations