Introduction : Acute pancreatitis is one of the most common causes of acute abdomen. Increased rates of hospitalization pose a signicant burden on health care costs and resource utilization. Our aim in this study is to assess whether moderate Objective : uid resuscitation instead of aggressive approach would benet in the management of acute pancreatitis. :A total of 100 patients s Methods uffering from acute abdomen due to acute pancreatitis were recruited and studied in two groups. One group was managed via moderate uid resuscitation whereas the other group was managed aggressively in terms of uid therapy. The outcomes were measured as primary and secondary. Primary included the development of moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis (according to the Revised Atlanta Classication) during the hospitalization whereas secondary compared the duration of hospital stay; intensive care unit (ICU) admission; the number of days in the ICU; the use of nutritional support and death. Results :Out of 100 subjects enrolled, 68 were males and 32females. There was no signicant between-group difference in the development of moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis (primary outcome), which occurred in 22% of the patients in the aggressive-resuscitation group and in 19% of those in the moderate-resuscitation group. Organ failure occurred in 8% of the patients in the aggressive-resuscitation group and in 4% of those in the moderate-resuscitation group. A total of 9% of the patients in the aggressive-resuscitation group and 2% of those in the moderateresuscitation group were admitted to the ICU. Conclusion : Aggressive uid resuscitation increased the risk of volume overload. Aggressive uid resuscitation was associated with a tendency toward a higher intensity of symptoms and a longer duration of hospital stay and a higher incidence of necrotizing pancreatitis than moderate uid resuscitation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ratnakar et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: