Transforming Teaching Practices Through Comprehensive Clinical Supervision in Secondary Schools

The teachers do not agree that the principal's supervision is more bureaucratic and autocratic, emphasizing hierarchy. The fact is that 44% of teachers do not like the supervision carried out in the classroom by either the principal or his deputy, and 58.8% of secondary school teachers disagree with teaching observations. This is urgent to research because there is a difference between theory and reality. This research aimed to evaluate the effect of clinical supervision on the teaching performance of teachers in secondary schools. Quantitative research method using a combination of teaching and learning observation instruments that have been adapted from all schools in assessing. The subjects were 38 secondary school teachers. Data collection techniques using observation instruments. The instrument was developed from indicators used as a tool to measure teacher performance. The instrument is given a score from point 1 to point 5. Analysis technique using SPSS Version 25.0 with measurements based on Learning Plans, induction tools, material delivery, questioning techniques, student involvement, reinforcement, training, and student assignments, checking training and student assignments, closing learning, and classroom management before and after clinical supervision. The results and findings of this research help teachers in schools to know the strengths and weaknesses when teaching is delivered in class. Clinical supervision also helps teachers improve the teaching and learning process more effectively so that teaching can improve student mastery. Clinical supervision can also be used as a guide for high school students to improve their knowledge.