The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the vulnerabilities of urban systems during health crises, particularly in smaller cities and rural communities where resilience strategies remain underexplored.This study addresses this gap by examining urban and rural responses in Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand, providing a comprehensive perspective on pandemic resilience strategies tailored to diverse environmental contexts and demographic setups.The study aims to identify key factors enhancing resilience and to assess the effectiveness of different strategies across these varied settings.Findings reveal significant differences in resilience capacities: urban and rural settings benefit from diverse occupational structures and infrastructures, supporting dynamic pandemic responses; rural areas leverage strong community bonds but are constrained by resource limitations.This underscores the need for context-specific strategies that integrate social capital into resilience planning, emphasizing community initiatives and participatory governance.However, the study acknowledges limitations, primarily its focus on COVID-19 and challenges in defining urban systems' parameters, suggesting that future research should expand to include a broader spectrum of pandemics and disasters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prasartthai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: