Summary Hippocampal cells represent multiple dimensions of stimulus and behavioural context. Time-cells encode the dimension of time between events, but it is unclear if their properties depend on the behavioural paradigm. We find that in the sub-second time-scales of trace eyeblink conditioning (TEC), time cells occur both in stimulus and post-stimulus periods, and are insensitive both to modality and to state of learning. This contrasts with time-cell stimulus-dependence in delay non-match to sample (DNMS) tasks (∼10 seconds). We observe 87% turnover of time-cells on successive days, but those time-cells which persist retain selectivity to stimulus and post-stimulus periods respectively. Finally, we show that 60% of time-encoding cells are active after the stimulus period, potentially providing an event trace for the network to link to later stimuli. Overall, TEC time-cells have distinct properties during turnover and are independent from behavioural state and contingency compared to DNMS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bhattacharjee et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: