Objectives Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) are the most common health-care-associated infections in neonatal intensive care units.¹ CLABSI are primary bloodstream infections in patients that had a central line in place within 48 hours before the development of the infection.² CLABSI rates are calculated as follows: number of line infections/number of central line days x 1000. In 2021, analysis of data from 2020 revealed our unit CLABSI rate was >7/1000 central line days. Multiple interventions were then implemented with the aim of reducing CLABSI rates to <5/1000 central line days within two years. Methods Over a two-year period, multiple interventions were implemented in a phased manner with the aim of reducing CLABSI rates (table 1). To determine the effectiveness of those interventions, CLABSI rates were calculated for two six-month periods pre and post implementation (data from 2020 and 2023 respectively). For each positive blood culture reported within these time frames, medical records were reviewed to determine if a central line was in situ within the 48 hours prior to the collection of the culture. The number of central line days for each six-month period was obtained from a neonatal database. Results Pre intervention, 7 infants with positive blood cultures had a central line in situ during the 48 hours prior to the culture collection. The number of central line days during this period was 631, providing a CLABSI rate of 11.09. Post intervention, one infant had a central line in the 48 hours prior to positive culture collection. The number of central line days was 740, providing a CLABSI rate of 1.35 (figure 1). Conclusion Following the implementation of multiple interventions, a significant reduction in the CLABSI rate occurred on our neonatal unit. References Ista, E, van der Hoven, B, Kornelisse, RF, van der Starre, C, Vos, MC, Boersma, E & Helder, OK. The Lancet: Infectious Diseases 2016. Centre for Health and Data Analysis. Rhode Island Department of Health 2012.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Murray et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: