Background: Dental implant therapy may be associated with breakage and deformation of implant-supported restorations, necessitating an assessment of their stress-strain state when applying a load. Aim: To compare the stress-strain state of implants with their respective fixed restorations in tooth replacement. Materials and Methods: A 3D mathematical model of the posterior mandible with three missing teeth was used to assess the stress-strain state for the following dental restoration options: three implant-supported crowns; a two-implant-supported bridge; or a bridge supported by tooth and implant. A 150 N load was applied to the central part of a restoration in both vertical and oblique directions to compare maximum stress values and their distribution. Results: Oblique load was found to have a negative impact on stress intensity and distribution (471.7 MPa vs 90.7 MPa with vertical load for three implants). The most heavily loaded parts of restorations were identified: the border of the crown and the implant connection zone. A homogeneous stress distribution from a bridge to the two supporting implants was observed, along with a decrease in stress when using a bridge rather than three implant-supported crowns (160.0 MPa vs 16.1 MPa). In contrast, the load on the supporting implant increased when a bridge supported by tooth and implant was used (1,053.5 MPa with oblique load). Conclusion: Compared to three implants replacing three missing teeth, a two-implant-supported bridge decreases stress on the implants and their respective restoration. Replacing one supporting implant with a tooth increases stress on the implant to the ultimate strength of titanium alloy in the abutment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bersanova et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: