Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Purpose This paper aims to investigate the differences in hot corrosion behavior of the GTD222 superalloy and TiC/GTD222 composite in a mixed salt of 75% Na 2 SO 4 and 25% K 2 SO 4 at 900°C. Design/methodology/approach The GTD222 superalloy and TiC/GTD222 nickel-based composite were prepared using selective laser melting (SLM). Subsequently, the hot corrosion behavior of the two alloys was systematically investigated in a salt mixture consisting of 75% Na 2 SO 4 and 25% K 2 SO 4 (Wt.%) at 900°C. Findings The TiC/GTD222 composite exhibited better hot corrosion resistance compared to the GTD222 superalloy. First, the addition of alloying elements led to the formation of a protective oxide film on the TiC/GTD222 composites 20 h before hot corrosion. Second, TiC/GTD222 composite corrosion surface has a higher Ti content, after 100 h of hot corrosion, the composite corrosion surface Ti content of 10.8% is more than two times the GTD222 alloy 4% Ti. The Ti and Cr oxides are tightly bonded, effectively resisting the erosion of corrosive elements. Originality/value The hot corrosion behavior of GTD222 superalloy and TiC/GTD222 composites prepared by SLM in a mixed salt of 75% Na 2 SO 4 and 25% K 2 SO 4 was studied for the first time. This study provides insights into the design of high-temperature alloys resistant to hot corrosion.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lv et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: