Abstract Background: For pediatric oncology patients and their parents, Fear of Progression (FoP) is a main psychosocial burden. While promising programs for adult patients exist, the specific needs in pediatrics have not been addressed yet. We developed an intervention and examined its effectiveness in a small sample. Methods: 29 families with a child with cancer in acute treatment or follow-up care and elevated FoP-levels participated. The intervention consists of psychoeducation, anxiety confrontation, and resource activation and is proofed in a randomized control study (RCT) with a wait list group who received treatment as usual (tau). All participants completed questionnaires on FoP and secondary outcomes (depression, quality of life, anxiety, post-traumatic stress symptoms) at different time points. We calculated Mann-Whitney-U-tests for between and within group comparisons as well as multiple regression to explore differential effectiveness. Results: There was a significant difference in FoP after intervention/tau between the two groups (W=62, p=.023) with high effect size (g=-0.855, 95% CI [-1.596;-0.115]). The pre-post and follow-up comparison showed that parental (W=462.5, p≤.001, g=0.855; 95% CI[0.517;1.193]) but not child´s (W=15, p=.438) FoP decreased significantly after intervention, and vice versa after follow-up (parents: W=251.5, p=.953; children: W=21, p=.034, g=0.244; 95% CI [0.039;0.449]). Time since diagnosis may influence the intervention effect (β=-0.447; p≥.004). Discussion: The intervention can significantly reduce parental FoP and seems promising for children. However, a major limitation of our study is the small sample size. Conclusion: The intervention represents an initial approach to treat elevated FoP in pediatric oncology.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Herrmann et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: