With the continuous acceleration of urbanization, the link between the level of urban community governance and the well-being of residents is becoming closer, and the unique position and function of urban community governance in the process of urbanization and modernization are becoming more and more prominent. This study establishes the mediation effect and moderating effect models based on the behaviors of multiple subjects participating in community governance, and proposes the testing methods of the two effect models for urban community governance. On this basis, the urban governance operation model and organizational structure are constructed based on the collaborative governance of multiple subjects. Through empirical analysis, in the analysis of the mediation model of urban governance, the coefficients of determination R² are 0.62, 0.71 and 0.75, respectively, and in the analysis of the moderating effect model, the coefficients of determination R² are 0.55, 0.518 and 0.553, respectively. After community governance, the scores of urban community’s satisfaction with public services, sense of well-being, social support, sense of belonging to the community, motivation for public services and sense of political efficacy of the community are all greater than 4 points. The scores of the six aspects are all greater than 4. The urban governance model in this paper has significant effects and provides an effective method for improving the effectiveness of urban community governance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhisong Wu (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: