Legume-based intercropping systems are a beneficial alternative for soil functioning, and rhizobacterial community diversity, while can contribute to reduce external inputs. Hence, the aims of this work were to assess: (i) the biological N fixation (BNF) process of cowpea and fava bean under different intercropping patterns compared to monocultures, (ii) the relationship between biologically fixed N and the crop biomass and yields, and (iii) the possible intra- and interspecific competition processes in each intercropping pattern. We compared, for three years, the monocultures of melon and cowpea with three different melon-cowpea intercropping patterns, and the monocultures of broccoli and fava bean with three different broccoli-fava bean intercropping patterns. The different intercropping patterns were: mixed intercropping, row intercropping 1:1 (vegetable:legume), and row intercropping 2:1 (vegetable:legume). Fertilization was reduced by 30 % in the diversified plots. After three years, BNF was higher in cowpea under monoculture (16.55 kg N ha-1), while fava bean showed higher BNF under intercropping row 1:1 (81.49 kg N ha-1). The relative crop yield (g plant-1) and plant biomass (g plant-1) were sensitive indicators to assess the intra- and interspecific interactions. Cowpea showed higher relative yield under mixed intercropping (41.45 g plant-1), coinciding with lower values of N derived from the air (Ndfa = 16.59 %). Fava bean showed the lowest relative yield in the mixed intercropping (195 g plant-1), coinciding with the highest value of Ndfa (92.71 %). The BNF by fava bean was positively correlated with the relative broccoli yield, not observed for cowpea/melon crop. Cowpea showed no effects of inter- or intraspecific competition with similar relative crop yield and plant biomass in monocultures than intercrops. On the contrary, fava bean was more sensitive to inter- and intraspecific competition, with increased biomass and relative crop yields when plant density was low. As a consequence, for fava bean, intercropping row 1:1 and 2:1 contributed to highest relative yield (551 g plant-1 and 613 g plan-1, respectively) and biomass (181 g plant-1 and 101 g plan-1, respectively), just the patterns with lower inter- and intraspecific competition. This research provides insights about how different legumes behave differently when grown intercropped with vegetables, in terms of NBF, growth and yields: competition and facilitation processes are different when comparing fava bean and cowpea grown as intercrops. Both legume species can be recommended for intercropping systems with a reduction in fertiliser rates and no negative effect on cash crops. However, excessive interspecific competition may reduce fava bean biomass and yields, not observed with cowpea intercropped with melon.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sánchez‐Navarro et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: