Experimental study shows comparable performance and reduced emissions in recycled aggregate concrete, highlighting pressurized carbonation as a pathway for sustainable construction.
Recent studies have demonstrated that the carbonation treatment of recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) could enhance its properties by the conversion of adhesive paste to stronger and denser products. In addition, the use of RCA and the sequestration of CO 2 during the CO 2 -treatment process can help to reduce the carbon footprint of concrete. This study assesses the performance of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) developed from CO 2 -treated RCA. RCAs obtained from over 20 old highway and airfield pavements were treated under different pressures (5, 10, 20, 40, and 60 pounds per square inch [psi]) of CO 2 . The physical and mechanical properties of RCA were then examined. The complete substitution of natural coarse aggregate was carried out using both untreated and treated RCA, followed by an assessment of the resulting RAC’s fresh, mechanical, and durability properties. Furthermore, the environmental performance of concrete incorporating untreated and treated RCA was evaluated. The experimental findings revealed that the CO 2 treatment pressure had a significant influence on RCA characteristics, leading to notable improvements in the mechanical and durability properties of RAC. Results demonstrated that by employing CO 2 treatment at pressures of 20, 40, and 60 psi, concrete incorporating complete RCA replacement can achieve properties comparable to concrete with natural aggregate. Moreover, the RAC produced using CO 2 -treated RCA demonstrated a reduced CO 2 equivalent when compared with concrete incorporating natural aggregate or untreated RCA. These findings underscore the potential of CO 2 -treated RCA as a viable and environmentally friendly alternative to natural aggregate for sustainable concrete production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ismail et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: