The construction sector generates substantial construction and demolition (C&D) waste, with concrete accounting for up to 67% by weight. While recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) offers a sustainable solution, traditional RCA exhibits inferior properties that limit widespread adoption. CO₂ treatment has emerged as an effective enhancement method, transforming hydration products into calcium carbonate and silica gel through controlled carbonation processes. However, a critical knowledge gap exists regarding comprehensive durability assessment of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) incorporating CO₂ -treated RCA for transportation infrastructure applications. This research evaluates systematic methodologies for assessing the long-term durability of carbonated RCA concrete under various exposure conditions. Advanced analytical techniques, including Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and X-ray Diffraction (XRD) methods were examined for microstructural characterization, alongside field-applicable tests such as the Super Air Meter (SAM) for freeze-thaw resistance assessment, Surface Resistivity Testing for transport property evaluation, Accelerated Concrete Prism Testing (ACPT) for alkali-silica reactivity, and Initial Surface Absorption Testing for permeability analysis. Literature results demonstrate that properly carbonated RCA achieves durability properties comparable to natural aggregates while providing CO₂ sequestration benefits, with improvements of up to 33, 12.1, and 28% in compressive, splitting, and flexural strengths, respectively. The carbonation process effectively reduces aggregate pH from approximately 12.0 to below 9.8, mitigating alkali-silica reaction risks and enhancing compatibility with fresh cementitious binders. This research provides practical guidance on standardized durability assessment protocols that enable confident adoption of CO₂ -treated RCA in transportation infrastructure, supporting sustainable development through reduced environmental impact and enhanced material performance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mozumder et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: