We consider the fundamental problem of designing a truthful single-item auction with the challenging objective of extracting a large fraction of the highest agent valuation as revenue.Following a recent trend in algorithm design, we assume that the agent valuations belong to a known interval, and a (possibly erroneous) prediction for the highest valuation is available.Then, auction design aims for high consistency and robustness, meaning that, for appropriate pairs of values γ and ρ, the extracted revenue should be at least a γ-or ρ-fraction of the highest valuation when the prediction is correct for the input instance or not.We characterize all pairs of parameters γ and ρ so that a randomized γ-consistent and ρ-robust auction exists.Furthermore, for the setting in which robustness can be a function of the prediction error, we give sufficient and necessary conditions for the existence of robust auctions and present randomized auctions that extract a revenue that is only a polylogarithmic (in terms of the prediction error) factor away from the highest agent valuation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Caragiannis et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: