In the US, standardized testing in K–12 classrooms historically cultivated teacher perceptions of incoherencies with evidence-based practices and professional knowledge. In the last decade, changes in federal education law and widespread state adoption of the Next-Generation Science Standards (NGSS) have opened unprecedented opportunities for states to fully involve teachers in the creation of standardized science assessments. This mixed methods study examined how a cohort of K–12 science teachers perceived their professionalism, knowledge of the NGSS, and coherency among the NGSS and classroom science assessments after an intensive series of workshops creating NGSS-aligned items for the Illinois standardized science assessment. Despite tensions adhering to state requirements, teachers described a sense of professionalism and autonomy over the items produced, deeper knowledge of the standards, and changed views of assessment. Results can inform policymakers seeking to localize standard-aligned science test items while positively impacting science teachers' perceptions and classroom practices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bancroft et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: