Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Introduction: Hospitalizations due to exacerbated asthma remai ns high in Sri Lanka leaving a huge burden on the healthcare system. Identification of the burden of ‘high risk asthma patients’ for hospitalization due to exacerbation is a cost-effective strategy for prioritizing management options. Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of ‘high-risk asthma patients ’ and selected risk predictors for hospitalization due to exacerbation among asthma patients aged ≥20 years in the district of Gampaha, Sri Lanka Methods: A community-based descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among 1200 asthma patients aged ≥20 years, selected using a multistage sampling technique. The risk for hospi talization was assessed using a newly developed and validated risk prediction model. High-risk asthma patients were defi ned according to the cut-off value of the summary risk score of the model. Results: The prevalence of ‘high-risk asthma patients’ for hospitali zation due to exacerbation was 16.4% (95% CI: 14.2, 18.6). The prevalence of selected risk predictors: age ≥ 60 years 24.2% (95% CI: 21.9, 26.7), poor educational attainment 67.3% (95% CI: 64.5, 70.0), having diabetes mellitus 18.8% (95% CI: 16.5, 21.0), family history of asthma 41.3% (95% CI: 38.5, 44.2), ever smoked 12.2% (95% CI: 10.2, 14.1), ever int ubated or given intensive care 2.8% (95% CI: 1.8, 3.7), previous hospitalizations due to exacerbations 6.6% (95% CI: 5.1, 8.0) , having uncontrolled asthma 63.6% (95% CI: 60.8, 66.7), having symptomatic GORD 18% (95% CI: 15.7, 20.2) and ha ving body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m2 36.3% (95% CI: 33.5, 39.0). Conclusions & Recommendations: A significant proportion of asthm a patients being at risk of hospitalization indicates the need to adopt cost-effective asthma management strategies to ac hieve better control of the disease. Prompt primary healthcare interventions are required to address modifiable risk predi ctors among asthma patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Punyadasa et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: