A population-based cohort study evaluates the burden of asthma exacerbations in severe asthma, suggesting implications for healthcare policies.
Background The burden of severe asthma due to asthma exacerbation is increasing. However, recent studies identifying exacerbation-related disease burden among patients with severe asthma in South Korea are lacking. Objective To evaluate the burden of asthma exacerbations in patients with severe asthma in South Korea. Methods A retrospective cohort study using National Health Insurance data from 2016 to 2019 was conducted. Patients with severe asthma were defined as satisfying the following criteria: (1) having been prescribed ≥1 inhaled corticosteroid-long-acting β-2 agonist and long-acting muscarinic antagonist with a diagnosis of asthma; (2) having experienced ≥4 asthma exacerbation events within 1 year, after meeting the first criterion. Exacerbation was defined as a corticosteroid burst. Healthcare utilisation, direct medical costs and case fatality rates related to asthma exacerbations were identified during the follow-up period. Results Outpatient visits accounted for 81.26% of all exacerbation events, followed by general ward hospitalisation (14.55%). The exacerbation-related costs were as follows: outpatient visit, $29.89; emergency room visit, $95.02; general ward hospitalisation, $1929.32; and intensive care unit admission, $7918.86. The case fatality rates were 2.65% for patients with asthma, 3.16% for patients who had exacerbations and 6.96% for patients who had exacerbations with hospitalisation. Conclusion This study is the first population-based cohort study observing exacerbation-related burdens in patients with severe asthma, using recent data and generating real-world evidence. The results of this study can be used as evidence for further research on the burden of asthma and to inform decision-making in healthcare policy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pyun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: