Theoretical analysis demonstrates tournament rules achieving 3-SNM-1/2 manipulability alongside Condorcet consistency, highlighting improved defense against multi-team collusion.
A tournament organizer must select one of n possible teams as the winner of a competition after observing all n2 matches between them. The organizer would like to find a tournament rule that simultaneously satisfies the following desiderata. It must be Condorcet-consistent (henceforth, CC), meaning it selects as the winner the unique team that beats all other teams (if one exists). It must also be strongly non-manipulable for groups of size k at probability α (henceforth, k-SNM-α), meaning that no subset of ≤ k teams can fix the matches among themselves in order to increase the chances any of it's members being selected by more than α. Our contributions are threefold. First, wee consider a natural generalization of the Randomized Single Elimination Bracket rule from [Schneider et al. 2017] to d-ary trees and provide upper bounds to its manipulability. Then, we propose a novel tournament rule that is CC and 3-SNM-1/2, a strict improvement upon the concurrent work of [Dinev and Weinberg, 2022] who proposed a CC and 3-SNM-31/60 rule. Finally, we initiate the study of reductions among tournament rules.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikšaník et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: