A Comparative Study on Imputation Techniques: Introducing a Transformer Model for Robust and Efficient Handling of Missing EEG Amplitude Data

In clinical datasets, missing data often occur due to various reasons including non-response, data corruption, and errors in data collection or processing. Such missing values can lead to biased statistical analyses, reduced statistical power, and potentially misleading findings, making effective imputation critical. Traditional imputation methods, such as Zero Imputation, Mean Imputation, and k-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) Imputation, attempt to address these gaps. However, these methods often fall short of accurately capturing the underlying data complexity, leading to oversimplified assumptions and errors in prediction. This study introduces a novel Imputation model employing transformer-based architectures to address these challenges. Notably, the model distinguishes between complete EEG signal amplitude data and incomplete data in two datasets: PhysioNet and CHB-MIT. By training exclusively on complete amplitude data, the TabTransformer accurately learns and predicts missing values, capturing intricate patterns and relationships inherent in EEG amplitude data. Evaluation using various error metrics and R2 score demonstrates significant enhancements over traditional methods such as Zero, Mean, and KNN imputation. The Proposed Model achieves impressive R2 scores of 0.993 for PhysioNet and 0.97 for CHB-MIT, highlighting its efficacy in handling complex clinical data patterns and improving dataset integrity. This underscores the transformative potential of transformer models in advancing the utility and reliability of clinical datasets.