Genomic selection (GS) has become an indispensable tool in modern plant breeding, particularly for complex traits. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of GS in predicting rust ( Uromyces pisi ) resistance in pea ( Pisum sativum ), using a panel of 320 pea accessions and a set of 26,045 Silico-Diversity Arrays Technology (Silico-DArT) markers. We compared the prediction abilities of different GS models and explored the impact of incorporating marker × environment (M×E) interaction as a covariate in the GBLUP (genomic best linear unbiased prediction) model. The analysis included phenotyping data from both field and controlled conditions. We assessed the predictive accuracies of different cross-validation strategies and compared the efficiency of using single traits versus a multi-trait index, based on factor analysis and ideotype-design (FAI-BLUP), which combines traits from controlled conditions. The GBLUP model, particularly when modified to include M×E interactions, consistently outperformed other models, demonstrating its suitability for traits affected by complex genotype-environment interactions (GEI). The best predictive ability (0.635) was achieved using the FAI-BLUP approach within the Bayesian Lasso (BL) model. The inclusion of M×E interactions significantly enhanced prediction accuracy across diverse environments in GBLUP models, although it did not markedly improve predictions for non-phenotyped lines. These findings underscore the variability of predictive abilities due to GEI and the effectiveness of multi-trait approaches in addressing complex traits. Overall, our study illustrates the potential of GS, especially when employing a multi-trait index like FAI-BLUP and accounting for M×E interactions, in pea breeding programs focused on rust resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osuna‐Caballero et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: