We present a comprehensive Fermi liquid description for thermoelectric transport and current noise, applicable to multilevel quantum dots (QD) and magnetic alloys (MA) without electron-hole or time-reversal symmetry.Our formulation for the low-energy transport is based on an Anderson model with N discrete impurity levels, and is asymptotically exact at low energies, up to the nextleading order terms in power expansions with respect to temperature T and bias voltage eV .The expansion coefficients can be expressed in terms of the Fermi liquid parameters, which include the three-body correlation functions defined with respect to the equilibrium ground state in addition to the linear susceptibilities and the occupation number N d of impurity electrons.We apply this formulation to the SU(N ) symmetric QD and MA, and calculate the correlation functions for N = 4 and 6, using numerical renormalization group approach.The three-body correlations are shown to be determined by a single parameter over a wide range of electron fillings 1 ≲ N d ≲ N -1 for strong Coulomb interactions U , and they also exhibit the plateau structures due to the SU(N ) Kondo effects at integer values of N d .We find that the Lorenz number L = κ/(T σ) for QD and MA, defined as the ratio of the thermal conductivity κ to the electrical conductivity σ, deviates from the universal Wiedemann-Franz value π 2 /(3e 2 ) as the temperature increases from T = 0, showing the T 2 dependence, the coefficient for which depends on the three-body correlations away from half filling.Furthermore, we find that the current noise for the SU(4) quantum dots and that for SU(6) show a pronounced difference at the quarter N d /N = 1/4 and 3/4 fillings.In particular, the linear noise for N = 4 exhibits a flat peak while the peak for N = 6 shows a round shape, reflecting the fact that, at these filling points, the SU(N ) Kondo effects occur for N ≡ 0 (mod 4), whereas the intermediate-valence fluctuations occur for N ≡ 2 (mod 4).We also demonstrate the role of three-body correlations on the nonlinear current noise and the other transport coefficients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Teratani et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: