Carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) has obtained the widespread use in significant basic parts owing to its excellent properties. Different methods including the conventional PCD tool using dry machining (CPD), the conventional PCD tool with CO 2 cryogenic cooling (CPC), and the textured PCD tool with CO 2 cryogenic cooling (TPC), were introduced to investigated their effects on the holes-making performance. Results demonstrated that the obtained average entrance diameter and relative error of different spindle speeds using the CPC were about 4001 to 4005.4 μm and 0.025% to 0.65%, respectively. Dimensional accuracy and surface edge quality of entrance hole can be better improved by the CPC method. It was found that the cryogenic cooling method showed the remarkable effect in improving the anti-adhesion of tools than compared to the dry machining. Additionally, results indicated that the cryogenic cooling resulted in the significant fiber fractures and many pits inside the hole wall and the CPD method can help to improve the inner hole wall quality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Su et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: