CFRP Side Milling: Matched Comparison of WC-Co and PCD Tool Concepts

Carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) components commonly require milling to achieve final dimensional accuracy and surface integrity, yet tool selection remains a trade-off between surface quality, process load, and cost. This study compared two industrial tool concepts for CFRP side milling under matched cutting conditions: a WC-Co compression-type end mill and a PCD end mill. A two-factor central composite design with 13 parameter sets was used, and tool effects were evaluated through paired differences in Ramean, Rzmean, and Fxy,RMS. The PCD tool significantly improved surface quality, with mean paired differences of −2.00 µm for Ramean and −6.67 µm for Rzmean, while increasing Fxy,RMS by 14.86 N relative to WC-Co. Response-surface analysis showed that the roughness advantage of PCD was broadly stable across the investigated process window, whereas the force penalty was nonlinear and was best described by a second-order CCD model (R2 = 0.820, model p = 0.015), with a significant quadratic cutting-speed term. Scenario-based decision analysis further showed that PCD was preferred in 12 of 13 DOE points under quality-driven weighting, whereas WC-Co was preferred in all 13 points under cost-driven weighting. The results indicate that PCD is the preferred quality-oriented solution for CFRP side milling, while WC-Co remains advantageous when lower load or lower cost is prioritized.