The scientific article is devoted to highlighting the state of scientific development of appeals of decisions, actions or inaction of a notary public service provider. Approaches to understanding the categories of public services and challenging decisions, actions or inaction of a notary public are considered. It was concluded that, based on scientific developments, we will distinguish signs of appeal of decisions, actions or inaction of a notary public service provider: the subject of the appeal is legal relations during notarial activity; direct initiative (application) of individuals and legal entities; the imperative of legal regulation; implementation according to the relevant administrative procedure; the result of an appeal against decisions, actions or inaction of a notary on the provision of administrative services is an individual act of a standard form or an administrative act. Appealing the decisions, actions or inaction of a notary public service provider should be understood as the procedure for applying for the protection of one’s rights and interests protected by law aimed at consideration and resolution by the court of cases related to notarial acts performed or refusal to perform them, notarial acts. Attention is drawn to the fact that appeals against decisions, actions or inaction of public administration bodies for the provision of administrative services are carried out according to the appropriate procedure. For example, if the appeal of the service is carried out in an administrative (out-of-court) procedure, then the claimant can appeal the service only within the authority that issued the service or to a higher division. At the same time, the analysis of scientific publications, monographic studies, practical recommendations, as well as the results of appeals against decisions, actions or inactions of notaries public services in Ukraine show that a comprehensive scientific approach is needed to study the features of appeals against decisions, actions or inactions of notaries public services services in Ukraine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ye.Ye. Kondratiev (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: