July 20, 2024Legal Issues in the Digital AgeOpen Access

Technologies Versus Justice: Challenges of AI Regulation in the Judicial System

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

ЕBЕlena BurdinaManash Kozybayev North Kazakhstan University VKV.A. KornevVoronezh State Medical Academy named after N.N. Burdenko

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Philosophical and legal analysis demonstrates fundamental limits of artificial intelligence in courts, suggesting automated systems should support rather than replace human judges.

Key Points

Decisions satisfying the core principles of justice remain beyond artificial intelligence, requiring human judges rather than automated algorithms to rule.
Philosophical and legal analysis of smart court initiatives shows that automated systems cannot replicate human reasoning during complex legal judgment.
Establishing strict regulatory restrictions highlights that digitalization and robot judge tools should assist rather than replace judicial authorities.

Cite This Study

Burdina et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e5fa66b6db64358758e796 https://doi.org/10.17323/2713-2749.2024.2.113.126

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Philosophical and legal analysis demonstrates fundamental limits of artificial intelligence in courts, suggesting automated systems should support rather than replace human judges.

Technologies Versus Justice: Challenges of AI Regulation in the Judicial System

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Technologies Versus Justice: Challenges of AI Regulation in the Judicial System

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider