The article deals with the methods, structure and organization of school teaching of foreign languages with a view to their further practical application. In fact, teaching foreign languages is a unified system consisting of two types of communication. This includes both oral and written speech. The mastery of oral language communication consists of the following components: a) storing in memory a set of samples of sound language signs of all orders (mainly syntagmas, sentences and messages, but also individual words) necessary for communication in this area, b) mastering the skills of instant sign formation (formation of new syntagmas, sentences and messages) according to productive structures and semi-manufactured signs, subconsciously isolated from language material stored in memory and encountered in communication, i.e. ultimately by analogy with other language signs; c) mastery of the skills of correct physical reproduction of signs (i.e. pronunciation); d) mastery of the skills of listening (decoding) signs using the material accumulated in memory (listening). Since the methods and content of training significantly depend on the type of communication activity being mastered, the ways of implementing program tasks in different types should be considered separately. there is no "perfection" in mastering oral speech at all, not only in relation to a foreign language, but also in relation to the native language, and that we can only talk about full participation in a chosen field of linguistic communication and the ability to exchange information in a certain range of common topics with any member of the language team, for which it is necessary to master a very certain minimum of those the signs and skills mentioned above. The degree of proficiency in oral speech is such a specific thing that it can even be expressed by a numerical coefficient (if a numerical criterion for the correctness of speaking is found).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Natalya Bashlueva (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: