We construct the $z=0$ galaxy stellar mass function (GSMF) by combining the GSMF at stellar masses M_* 1011.3 M_ from the census study of Leja et al. (2020) and the GSMF of massive galaxies at M_* 1011.5 M_ from the volume-limited MASSIVE galaxy survey. To obtain a robust estimate of M_* for local massive galaxies, we use MASSIVE galaxies with M_* measured from detailed dynamical modeling or stellar population synthesis modeling (incorporating a bottom-heavy initial mass function) with high-quality spatially-resolved spectroscopy. These two independent sets of M_* agree to within ~7%. Our new $z=0$ GSMF has a higher amplitude at M_* 1011.5 M_ than previous studies, alleviating prior concerns of a lack of mass growth in massive galaxies between z~ 1 and 0. We derive a local black hole mass function (BHMF) from this GSMF and the scaling relation of SMBH and galaxy masses. The inferred abundance of local SMBHs above ~ 10¹⁰M_ is consistent with the number of currently known systems. The predicted amplitude of the nanohertz stochastic gravitational wave background is also consistent with the levels reported by Pulsar Timing Array teams. Our $z = 0$ GSMF therefore leads to concordant results in the high-mass regime of the local galaxy and SMBH populations and the gravitational wave amplitude from merging SMBHs. An exception is our BHMF yields a $z=0$ SMBH mass density that is notably higher than the value estimated from quasars at higher redshifts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liepold et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: