The suitability of electron‐rich bis‐silylenes, specifically the neutral chelating [Si II (Xant)Si II ] ligand (Si II =PhC(N t Bu) 2 Si, Xant=9,9‐dimethylxanthene) and the anionic [Si II (N Acrid )Si II )] − pincer ligand (N Acrid =2,7,9,9‐tetramethylacridane), has been successfully probed to stabilize monovalent bis‐silylene‐supported aluminium complexes (aluminylenes). At first, the unprecedented aluminium(III) iodide precursors [Si II (Xant)Si II ]AlI 2 + I − 1 and [Si II (N Acrid )Si II )]AlI 2 2 were synthesized using AlI 3 and [Si II (Xant)Si II ] or [Si II (N Acrid )Si II )]Li(OEt 2 )], respectively, and structurally characterized. While reduction of 1 with KC 8 led merely to unidentified products, the dehalogenation of 2 afforded the dimer of the desired {[Si II (N Acrid )Si II )]Al:} aluminylene with a four‐membered Si IV 2 Al III 2 ring. Remarkably, the proposed aluminylene intermediates [Si II (Xant)Si II ]Al I I and {[Si II (N Acrid )Si II )]Al:} could be produced through reaction of 1 and 2 with Collman's reagent, K 2 Fe(CO) 4 , and trapped as Al I :→Fe(CO) 4 complexes 5 and 6 , respectively. While 6 is stable in solution, 5 loses one CO ligand in solution to afford the silylene‐ and aluminylene‐coordinated iron(0) complex 7 from an intramolecular substitution reaction. The electronic structures of the novel compounds were investigated by Density Functional Theory calculations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saddington et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: