Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) criteria have emerged as pivotal factors in assessing a firm's sustainability and ethical impact. This paper investigates the relationship between ESG disclosure scores and firm performance among Chinese listed companies. Leveraging data from the CSMAR database, the study employs regression analysis to explore the impact of ESG pillars on operating performance (ROA), financial performance (ROCE), and market performance (Tobin’s Q). The findings reveal a significant positive correlation between the Social (S) pillar of ESG and firm performance, indicating that investments in social practices such as employee relations and community engagement contribute to stronger financial metrics. Conversely, the relationships with the Environmental (E) and Governance (G) pillars appear less clear, suggesting variability in ESG integration and industry-specific standards. These results underscore the evolving landscape of ESG practices in China and highlight the importance of enhancing ESG disclosures and adopting sustainable business practices in response to shifting market expectations and regulatory emphasis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiahua Zhang (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: