This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This article explores the innovative application of multi-criteria methods and neutrosophic logic in the analysis of productive factors, highlighting how these approaches can offer a more nuanced and comprehensive view of industrial and business dynamics ̣ Multicriteria methods allow different aspects to be evaluated simultaneously, considering complex variables that affect productivity and efficiency in various sectors ̣ On the other hand, neutrosophic logic introduces a theoretical framework that manages the uncertainty and imprecision inherent in many business decisions, offering tools to better interpret and manage the variabilities and ambiguities that influence productive results ̣ This integrative approach not only seeks to improve accuracy in the evaluation of critical factors such as cost, quality and time, but also to promote more informed and strategic decision making in competitive and changing environments ̣ By combining rigorous analysis with interpretive flexibility, the door is opened to new methodologies that can effectively adapt to the complexities of the globalized market and the dynamic demands of consumers ̣ This article examines case studies and practical examples to illustrate how these methods can be successfully applied in the optimization of production processes and in the formulation of business strategies that seek not only to remain competitive, but also to anticipate and proactively respond to emerging challenges ̣
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wendy et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: