This paper explores the different ways in which knowledge of ourselves as cognizers depends on the transcendental unity of apperception. First, since all cognition requires the transcendental unity of apperception, so does empirical knowledge of ourselves as cognizers. Second, since empirical cognizers are cognizers, they must possess the unity of self-consciousness required for cognition. Third, empirical psychology needs an object and the transcendental unity of apperception makes it possible to attach ‘I-think’ to representations of the empirical world, thereby supplying psychological states, such as ‘I think that bodies are heavy,’ to be studied. Finally, the Psychological Idea through which psychology is made systematic gets it first principle from the necessary unity of apperception.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Patricia Kitcher (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: