Abstract Introduction The benefits of metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) in people with body mass index (BMI) ≥50kg/m² are not well-established, with concerns of increased risk and poorer weight loss. Optimal surgical type (gastric bypass [GB] versus sleeve gastrectomy [SG]) is unclear, with studies comparing complication rates, weight loss, and glycemic outcomes reporting mixed results. Methods Participants with BMI≥50kg/m² undergoing MBS (SG or GB) from 2008-2022 were recruited. Demographics, anthropometrics, biochemistry and diabetes status were analysed at baseline, 12-months, and 24-months post-operatively. Surgical outcomes and complications were analysed. Results The study included n=184 with BMI≥50kg/m² (57.6% female, age 38.6±10.5years, BMI 55.3±6.0kg/m²). Pre-operatively, 21.1% had pre-diabetes and 33.2% had diabetes (mean HbA1c 8.0±1.7%). Most subjects (89.1%) underwent SG. The overall 30-day adverse event rate was 4.9%, higher in GB group (GB=15%, SG=3.7%, p=0.061). The GB group had longer length of stay (GB =4.5±0.6days, SG=3.1±0.2, p=0.023). The 30-day readmission rate was 2.2%, and rate of revisional surgery was 2.7%, with no significant difference between groups. The follow-up rate was 67.9% at 12-months, 51.1% at 24-months. Average %total weight loss at 12-months (27.4±9.0%, SG=27.6±9.0%, GB=26.0±9.4%, p=0.481) and 24-months (27.1±10.9%, SG=27.4±11.1%, GB=24.9±8.9%, p=0.495) were similar between groups. The GB group had a larger HbA1c reduction (3.2±1.1%) than SG (1.9 ±1.3%, p=0.030), but no difference in diabetes remission rates (69.2% at 12-months, 76.7% at 24-months). Conclusion MBS is safe and effective for individuals with BMI≥50kg/m², with good weight loss and glycemic outcomes with both SG and GB. Complication rates were low, although higher in the GB group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tan et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: