This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Recent studies show the growing significance of document retrieval in the generation of LLMs, i.e., RAG, within the scientific domain by bridging their knowledge gap. However, dense retrievers often struggle with domain-specific retrieval and complex query-document relationships, particularly when query segments correspond to various parts of a document. To alleviate such prevalent challenges, this paper introduces MixGR, which improves dense retrievers' awareness of query-document matching across various levels of granularity in queries and documents using a zero-shot approach. MixGR fuses various metrics based on these granularities to a united score that reflects a comprehensive query-document similarity. Our experiments demonstrate that MixGR outperforms previous document retrieval by 24.7% and 9.8% on nDCG@5 with unsupervised and supervised retrievers, respectively, averaged on queries containing multiple subqueries from five scientific retrieval datasets. Moreover, the efficacy of two downstream scientific question-answering tasks highlights the advantage of MixGRto boost the application of LLMs in the scientific domain.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cai et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: