Flow boiling has been identified as a promising method for heat acquisition in thermal management technologies. Common issues preventing flow boiling technology from being widely used are variable heat transfer characteristics as well as large pressure drops along the flow boiling channels. These complications arise from the phase change phenomenon and can be rather difficult to predict and characterize. A common approach to predict these phenomena are semi-empirical models, due to their simplicity and basis in well-established physics. These types of models employ a control volume approach where the conservation of mass, momentum, and energy are applied to solve for average quantities like mean vapor and liquid velocities. They are promising as they directly embed physics into solutions while also utilizing correlation-based methods to directly compute complex flow quantities like shear stress. As a result of utilizing correlations to fill in for hard to measure quantities, semi-empirical models act as a prelude to data driven methods in physical modelling. Physics informed neural networks (PINNs) are a recent advancement in the data-driven science and engineering field that also accurately model physics problems using data-driven techniques. In this paper we replace the semi-empirically derived interfacial shear stress term in the momentum equations, which often poorly predicts the interfacial shear stress, with an interfacial shear term informed by a PINN. In general, we find that the PINN is better at fitting the interfacial shear stress term than well-known correlations, with the added benefit of directly being able to include data into the modelling process. This paper demonstrates the effectiveness of data-driven solutions to differential equations for inferring complex flow quantities in under-determined systems, such as these semi-empirical models. Furthermore, applications of PINNs to flow boiling systems will aid in the advancement of thermal management technologies by improving model reliability and incorporation of experimental data directly into the computation process.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pirnstill et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: