PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 12, 2024Geological Society of America Bulletin1 citationsOpen Access

P−T evolution of metapelitic and metamafic rocks from Northern Liaoning: Implications on the Neoarchean tectonic regime of the North China Craton

View Full Paper
MGMinjie GuoTianjin University of Science and TechnologyJZJian ZhangPlanetary Science InstituteJQJiahui QianSun Yat-sen University

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

The Archean basement rocks in the Eastern Block of the North China Craton have undergone extensive granulite-facies metamorphism during the late Neoarchean to Paleoproterozoic. However, the geodynamic process and associated tectonic regime of this area remain poorly understood. The Qingyuan area of Northern Liaoning, located in the nucleus of the Eastern Block, plays a crucial role in unraveling the tectonothermal evolution by reconstructing its metamorphic history. Previous studies have mainly focused on the northern part of the area, while the tectonothermal evolution of the southern part remains unknown. In this study, we utilized petrography, phase equilibria modeling, and geochronology to constrain the pressure−temperature−time (P−T−t) paths of representative metapelite and metabasite samples of the area. Our results indicate that both samples have recorded anticlockwise P−T−t paths. The peak condition for the metapelitic rock sample 22QY02-9 is 10.0−11.2 kbar/800−815 °C. U-Pb zircon and monazite dating results indicate a post-peak metamorphic age of ca. 2470−2450 Ma. Metamafic rock sample 22QY04-3 reaches the ultrahigh temperature peak metamorphic condition of 11.5−12.5 kbar/920−950 °C, which is consistent with the results obtained from the ternary-feldspar thermometry calculations. U-Pb zircon dating reveals a cooling age of metamorphism at ca. 2487 Ma. By combining the data from this study with previous research, a sagduction model, operating under a non−plate tectonics regime, appears to be the most promising explanation for the most prevalent geological phenomena in the Neoarchean North China Craton.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guo et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e60873b6db64358759bc5ehttps://doi.org/10.1130/b37531.1
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Vestiges of early Earth’s deep subduction and CHONSP cycle recorded in Archean ophiolitic podiform chromitites2022 · 41 citations
  2. 2Melting in an Archaean mantle plume: heads it's basalts, tails it's komatiites1989 · 469 citations
  3. 3The application of zircon cathodoluminescence imaging, Th–U–Pb chemistry and U–Pb ages in interpreting discrete magmatic and high-grade metamorphic events in the North China Craton at the Archean/Proterozoic boundary2008 · 222 citations
  4. 4Archean blocks and their boundaries in the North China Craton: lithological, geochemical, structural and P–T path constraints and tectonic evolution2001 · 1,912 citations
  5. 5Neoarchean SSZ and MOR ultra-/high-pressure ophiolitic mélanges of the Eastern Hebei Complex, North China Craton: Dynamics of an Archean paleo-subduction zone2023 · 19 citations