Differences in the cage management systems used by broiler chicken breeders in this case open house, semi closed house, and closed house. These three cage management systems certainly affect the costs incurred by farmers in the process of raising chickens, so that they will affect the profits obtained. Therefore, there is a need for further research regarding income and productivity performance in chicken farms broiler which uses a cage management system open house, semi closed house, and closed house. The type of data analysis used in this research is quantitative research. The analysis used is descriptive analysis and business feasibility analysis to determine the productivity performance and feasibility of the chicken business broiler partnership pattern at PT. Sinar Jaya Partners. IP value on the enclosure open house with an average of 332, including the good category, the IP value in the cage semi closed house with an average of 381 including the very good category and the IP value at home closed house 478 are included in the special group category. The IOFCC value is highest in the cage system closed house, compared to the cage semi closed house and open house. PT partnership system. Mitra Sinar Jaya uses the cage type open house, semi closed house nor closed house meets business feasibility standards because the R/C Ratio value is >1. The NPV value shows that the partnership pattern livestock business at PT. Mitra Sinar Jaya is worth running because it has NPV>0. Meanwhile, it has an IRR value greater than the value discount rate used (6.5%).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ningsih et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: