Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
July 11, 2024Artificial IntelligenceOpen Access

Assessing Fidelity in XAI post-hoc techniques: A Comparative Study with Ground Truth Explanations Datasets

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MMMiquel Miró-NicolauAJAntoni Jaume-i-CapóGMGabriel Moyà-Alcover

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Comparative study of XAI methods evaluates fidelity using novel datasets, promoting accuracy in explanations.

Key Points

  • Higher fidelity methods deliver more reliable explanations, aiding trust in eXplainable Artificial Intelligence.
  • XAI techniques based on gradient calculation yield better accuracy compared to perturbation methods.
  • Novel datasets introduce reliable ground truth for evaluating XAI method fidelity, ensuring objective comparison and assessment standards in explainability research and applications. This is crucial for eliminating low-fidelity methods and fostering development of robust, trustworthy approaches.

Cite This Study

Miró-Nicolau et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e609b1b6db64358759c9d2https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2024.104179
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share