Scholars in the field of international entrepreneurship (IE) have recently directed their attention toward the post-entry processes of early internationalizing firms. Existing studies have extensively examined expansionary moves and have found that early foreign entry is likely to facilitate subsequent expansion. However, the role of contracting moves such as foreign divestment has received less attention. Drawing on the Penrosean perspective, we investigate how foreign divestment affects the subsequent expansions of early internationalizing firms. We propose that, while expansion into culturally distant markets hinders subsequent expansions, foreign divestment can mitigate this Penrose effect by releasing and redeploying managerial resources. We also hypothesize that given the imperfect fungibility of managerial resources across locations, the mitigation of Penrose effects by divestments is pronounced for early internationalizing firms that have divested their subsidiaries in culturally distant markets. Our 18-year longitudinal study of 132 Japanese early internationalizing firms supports our hypotheses.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kano et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: